Monday, December 31, 2012

Raising the computer stakes in our household: iPad Mini


Sharon just raised the computer stakes in our household by buying me a wi-fi iPad Mini.  Between us, we now own at least one of the following: Desk-top (Mac) > Laptop (PC/Windows) > Ultrabook (Apple) > Tablet (Apple)> Smartphone (Google/Android) > Music players/radios (iPod and MP3).

It’s interesting to speculate the direction that the personal computer arena will go and where we will fit into that evolving spectrum. I suppose my layman predictions will be (1) operating systems within one manufacturer’s suite (the way we use computers, tablets and smart-phones) will gradually merge and become seamless between the various devices (2) user-decisions on optimum size will mature; clearly ultra-books and the larger tablets already occupy the same physical space as do the smaller tablets (7-inch) and larger smart phones (5½ -inch). (3) solid-state memory is already available to 512 GB: presumably moving hard-drives in all but powerful desktops are destined to become dinosaurs (4) users will continue to migrate away from physical devices to the “cloud”. This may render some of the above points purely academic.  

The “need” for multiple devices remains, at least for now. If I was starting today, I would probably buy an ultra-book with whatever external accessories I need (CD drive, extra memory etc.), a 7-inch tablet with cellular capability (and therefore GPS navigation) and the cheapest phone I could find (all other capabilities residing with the tablet).  This assumes I do not want to be seen walking around holding the tablet to my ear.

And what are my first impressions of the iPad Mini? I suppose all tablets still operate like “big smart-phones” rather than “small computers” although it’s interesting that many of the tablet apps operate quite differently from their smart-phone brethren and clearly very differently from their computer equivalents. Even though the Big Three (Google, Microsoft and Apple) claim some level of interchangeability, it’s clear that different devices work far better by sticking to the platform for which they are designed (which is, of course, what the developers want). My iPad is a cool minicomputer but I spend a lot of time trying to get it to mimic my other devices (Google/Android) to maximize compatibility and minimize duplication. This means that I probably will not be able to take advantage of some of the Apple tablet’s capabilities which are operating-system dependent.

On the plus side: the Mini’s size/weight is great, construction quality is excellent, navigation through the pages and menus etc. is easy and battery life is very impressive. On the negative side, for some reason the Mini does not use Apple’s superior Retina display, there is no GPS capability or Google Maps and they are quite expensive (about $430 versus $250 for the Google Nexus 7).  Any meaningful comparison between the Mini and the latest Google products is tough: it really depends on which operating system horse you want to back.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

We still have a first-generation iPad and I recently got a Nexus 7. My primary interest in the tablet is for reading e-books and electronic copies of magazines. I prefer the size of the Nexus 7 over the iPad and iPad Mini. The Mini is too large to comfortably read with one hand. Apple also skimped on the iPad Mini's video quality--it's not as good as the Nexus 7. I'm sure that Apple will correct that in the 2013 version of the Mini.

What is clear is that the best apps and the best quality apps first appear on IOS devices. It's likely due to the fact that IOS users spend more money on apps and are responsible for most of the sales transactions completed via a mobile device. I'm a big fan of Flipboard and the app is certainly better on IOS than on Android.

Unknown said...

Ibought a couple Samsumg Galaxy Tab 10.1's from Costco for $270. Works great except Wall Street Journal. And you can install Flash, although it's not scantioned.